Two compact electric cars, roughly PKR 855,000 apart. Chery Q vs AION UT comes down to a clear trade-off: the Chery Q is cheaper and carries more listed technology, while the AION UT is longer and has the larger stated battery.
Here is the full comparison on price, powertrain, dimensions and features and where the data runs out.
Chery Q vs AION UT: Price Comparison
| Model | Price |
|---|---|
| Chery Q | PKR 5,544,000 |
| AION UT | PKR 6,399,000 |
The Chery Q price in Pakistan undercuts the AION UT price in Pakistan by PKR 855,000 — around 13%. That is a meaningful gap at this level, and it sets the frame for everything below: the AION UT has to justify the difference.
Chery Q vs AION UT Specifications
| Specification | Chery Q | AION UT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | PKR 5,544,000 | PKR 6,399,000 |
| Type | BEV | BEV |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Battery | Not specified | 44.12 kWh |
| Claimed range | ~400 km NEDC | ~400 km NEDC |
| Body & wheelbase | Shorter | Longer |
| Ground clearance | Higher | Lower |
| Camera | 540° | 360° |
| Parking assist | Automatic | Not listed here |
| ADAS | Level 2 | Not listed here |
| Infotainment | 15.6 in | 14.6 in |
| Alloy wheels | 17 in | 16 in |
"Not listed here" means the feature does not appear in this comparison data — it does not confirm the car lacks it. Confirm with the dealer. Range figures are claimed on the NEDC cycle, which is optimistic; real-world range will be lower.
Battery, Range and Powertrain
Both are full battery electric vehicles, and both are quoted at around 400 km on the NEDC cycle. NEDC is a lenient test standard by modern measures, so treat that number as a comparison point between the two rather than as the distance you will actually cover.
The AION UT has the stated battery capacity — 44.12 kWh. The Chery Q's capacity is not specified in this data, which is worth asking about, since capacity is what determines charging cost per full charge.
The powertrain layouts differ. The Chery Q is rear-wheel drive; the AION UT is front-wheel drive. RWD generally gives better traction under acceleration and a more balanced feel, while FWD is simpler and packages more efficiently — which usually translates into interior space.
Dimensions and Practicality
The AION UT has the longer body and wheelbase. Wheelbase is the number that matters most for passengers — it largely determines rear legroom and ride comfort over bumps. If you regularly carry adults in the back, that favours the AION UT.
The Chery Q has higher ground clearance, and in Pakistan that is not a minor detail. Speed breakers, broken road edges and standing water during monsoon punish low cars. Exact figures in millimetres are not specified for either, so it is worth measuring against your own routes rather than relying on "higher" and "lower".
Features and Technology
On the listed equipment, the Chery Q is the better-equipped car. It carries a 540° camera against the AION UT's 360°, Automatic Parking Assist, Level 2 ADAS, a larger 15.6-inch infotainment screen and 17-inch alloys.
The 540° camera is the genuinely useful one. A standard 360° system gives you a bird's-eye view around the car; the 540° addition provides a transparent-chassis effect showing what is under the front of the vehicle — helpful for kerbs and speed breakers, and for placing the wheels in tight parking.
One important qualification: ADAS and parking assist are not listed for the AION UT in this comparison, which is not the same as confirming it does not have them. Check the AION UT's full specification sheet with the dealer before drawing a conclusion. Our coverage of GAC AION UT in Pakistan covers the model's launch details, and our Chery Q specifications guide covers that car in full.
Chery Q vs AION UT: Key Differences
Chery Q
Rear-wheel drive · higher ground clearance · 540° camera · Automatic Parking Assist · Level 2 ADAS · 15.6-inch infotainment · 17-inch alloys · PKR 855,000 cheaper.
AION UT
Front-wheel drive · longer body and wheelbase · 44.12 kWh stated battery · 360° camera · 14.6-inch infotainment · 16-inch alloys.
Which One Fits Your Requirements?
Rather than naming a winner, match the cars to what you actually need:
Driver assistance and parking technology → the Chery Q carries the listed equipment.
Ground clearance for rough roads → Chery Q.
Rear passenger space → the AION UT's longer wheelbase.
Stated battery capacity → AION UT.
Lower purchase price → Chery Q, by PKR 855,000.
Drivetrain preference → RWD on the Chery Q, FWD on the AION UT.
Before deciding either way, confirm the full Pakistan specification sheet for both. Equipment lists shift between markets and variants, and a comparison built on incomplete data is a starting point rather than a conclusion. For wider context on running an EV here, our guide to EVs in Pakistan is worth reading alongside, and both cars sit within the wave of new models covered at the Pakistan Auto Show 2026.
Final Thoughts
On the data available, Chery Q vs AION UT is a trade between equipment and space. The Chery Q costs PKR 855,000 less and brings more listed technology plus higher ground clearance; the AION UT offers a longer wheelbase and a stated 44.12 kWh battery. Both are quoted at around 400 km NEDC, which is optimistic for real-world use. The gaps in this comparison matter too — the Chery Q's battery capacity and the AION UT's driver-assistance list are not specified here, so get both full spec sheets before committing.
15+ years in business · In-house fitting in Multan · Nationwide delivery · Exact-fit products, never universal
Browse All Car Accessories →Questions about what fits your car? Contact us — 0321-1117525 · Open Mon–Sun, 9am–9pm.
